This study compared the cost-efficacy ratios of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (LPV/r-MT) and of standard of care in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. The results of the efficacy and safety analyses are presented. We conducted a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial of HIV-infected adults on stable treatment, with HIV- RNA...
-
2014 (v1)PublicationUploaded on: April 14, 2023
-
2018 (v1)Publication
We propose a multidimensional first-level diagnostic assessment easy to use in routine clinical practice to allow infectious disease specialists to have a general and complete overview of persons living with HIV. Following the Delphi method, articles published from January 1, 2011 on controlled trials, clinical reports and observational studies...
Uploaded on: March 27, 2023 -
2017 (v1)Publication
Objectives: The AtLaS-M randomized trial showed that in patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL on atazanavir/ ritonavir + two NRTIs, switching to a dual therapy with atazanavir/ritonavir+lamivudine had superior efficacy as compared with continuing the previous triple therapy. This substudy was designed to evaluate at 48 weeks the impact of the...
Uploaded on: April 14, 2023 -
2016 (v1)Publication
Objectives: To report the 96 week results on efficacy, safety and bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with HIV-1 that were virologically suppressed and treated with atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus atazanavir/ ritonavir triple therapy. Methods: MODAt is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, 96 week trial...
Uploaded on: May 13, 2023