T-DM1 versus pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane as first-line therapy of early-relapsed HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: an Italian multicenter observational study
- Creators
- Schettini F.
- Conte B.
- Buono G.
- De Placido P.
- Parola S.
- Griguolo G.
- Fabi A.
- Bighin C.
- Riccardi F.
- Cianniello D.
- De Laurentiis M.
- Puglisi F.
- Pelizzari G.
- Bonotto M.
- Russo S.
- Frassoldati A.
- Pazzola A.
- Montemurro F.
- Lambertini M.
- Guarneri V.
- Cognetti F.
- Locci M.
- Generali D.
- Conte P.
- De Placido S.
- Giuliano M.
- Arpino G.
- Del Mastro L.
- Others:
- Schettini, F.
- Conte, B.
- Buono, G.
- De Placido, P.
- Parola, S.
- Griguolo, G.
- Fabi, A.
- Bighin, C.
- Riccardi, F.
- Cianniello, D.
- De Laurentiis, M.
- Puglisi, F.
- Pelizzari, G.
- Bonotto, M.
- Russo, S.
- Frassoldati, A.
- Pazzola, A.
- Montemurro, F.
- Lambertini, M.
- Guarneri, V.
- Cognetti, F.
- Locci, M.
- Generali, D.
- Conte, P.
- De Placido, S.
- Giuliano, M.
- Arpino, G.
- Del Mastro, L.
Description
BACKGROUND: The current standard first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (+) metastatic breast cancer is the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane (P + T + taxane), while standard second-line is ado-trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). The registration trial of pertuzumab, however, did not include early-relapsing patients, defined as patients experiencing tumor relapse ≤12 months from the end of (neo)adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Conversely, the pivotal trial of T-DM1 included some patients relapsing ≤6 months after the end of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Thus, a proportion of early-relapsing patients are currently eligible to receive T-DM1 as first-line treatment. Nevertheless, no direct comparison exists between the two regimens in this clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared T-DM1 versus P + T + taxane as first-line treatment in two cohorts of early-relapsing patients in an Italian 'real-world' setting, involving 14 public health care institutions. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included patients' characterization, overall survival and post-progression survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. All tests were two-sided and a P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among 1252 screened patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-four (58.7%) received P + T + taxane and 31 (41.3%) received T-DM1. The two cohorts showed similar characteristics of aggressiveness and no significant differences in treatment history. T-DM1, compared with P + T + taxane was associated with worse progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-4.52, P = 0.021) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-11.32, P = 0.010), irrespective of previous (neo)adjuvant treatment, age, hormone receptors status, time-to-relapse (≤6 months or within 6-12 months) and presence of visceral/brain metastases. No differences were observed in post-progression survival (P = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests superiority for P + T + taxane over T-DM1 as up-front treatment of early-relapsing HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, which merits further assessment in larger and prospective trials.
Additional details
- URL
- http://hdl.handle.net/11567/1050537
- URN
- urn:oai:iris.unige.it:11567/1050537
- Origin repository
- UNIGE