Disability in moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Prevalence, burden and assessment-results from a real-life study
- Creators
- BRAIDO, FULVIO
- Baiardini, Ilaria
- Scichilone, Nicola
- Sorino, Claudio
- Di Marco, Fabiano
- Corsico, Angelo
- Santus, Pierachille
- Girbino, Giuseppe
- Di Maria, Giuseppe
- MEREU, CARLO
- Sabato, Eugenio
- Foschino Barbaro, Maria Pia
- Cuttitta, Giuseppina
- Zolezzi, Alberto
- Bucca, Caterina
- Balestracci, Sara
- CANONICA, GIORGIO
- Others:
- Braido, Fulvio
- Baiardini, Ilaria
- Scichilone, Nicola
- Sorino, Claudio
- Di Marco, Fabiano
- Corsico, Angelo
- Santus, Pierachille
- Girbino, Giuseppe
- Di Maria, Giuseppe
- Mereu, Carlo
- Sabato, Eugenio
- Foschino Barbaro, Maria Pia
- Cuttitta, Giuseppina
- Zolezzi, Alberto
- Bucca, Caterina
- Balestracci, Sara
- Canonica, Giorgio
Description
Background: The role of disability and its association with patient-reported outcomes in the nonsevere forms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has never been explored. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess, in a cross-sectional real-life study, the prevalence and degree of disability in moderate COPD patients and to assess its association with health status, illness perception, risk of death and well-being. Methods: Moderate COPD outpatients attending scheduled visits were involved in a quantitative research program using a questionnaire-based data collection method. Results: Out of 694 patients, 17.4% were classified as disabled and 47.6% reported the loss of at least one relevant function of daily living. Disabled patients did not differ from nondisabled patients in terms of working status (p = 0.06), smoking habits (p = 0.134) and ongoing treatment (p = 0.823); however, the former showed a significantly higher disease burden as measured by illness perception, health status and well-being. The stepwise regression analysis showed that the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score was the most relevant factor related to COPD disability (F = 38.248; p = 0.001). Patient stratification was possible according to the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) value and an mMRC score ≥2, which identified disabled patients, whereas the mMRC values were differently associated with the risk of disability. Conclusion: A significant proportion of individuals with moderate COPD reported a limitation of daily life functions, with dyspnea being the most relevant factor inducing disability. Adding the evaluation of patient-reported outcomes to lung function assessment could facilitate the identification of disabled patients.
Additional details
- URL
- http://hdl.handle.net/11567/843691
- URN
- urn:oai:iris.unige.it:11567/843691
- Origin repository
- UNIGE