Advanced parametrisation of phase change materials through kinetic approach
- Others:
- Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Química Inorgánica
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). España
- Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO). España
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
- European Union (UE). H2020
- Junta de Andalucía
- European Commission (EC). Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)
Description
Phase change materials (PCM) have been widely investigated for heat storage and transfer applications. Numerous numerical simulation approaches have been proposed for modelling their behaviour and predicting their performance in thermal applications. However, simulation approaches do not consider the kinetics of the phase transition processes, compromising the accuracy of their predictions. The phase change is a kinetically driven process in which both the reaction rate and the reaction progress depend on the heating schedule. This work evaluates and parametrises the influence of kinetics in the melting and crystallisation behaviour of a well-known PCM, PEG1500, and compares potential discrepancies with common phase change parametrisation alternatives. The kinetic dependence was experimentally evaluated through differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The kinetic parameters required for modelling the kinetics of the processes were determined by both model-free and model-fitting procedures following ICTAC (International Confederation for Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry) recommendations. Then, the phase transition was parametrised through a kinetic model and compared with three conventional phase transition models: linear without hysteresis, non-linear without hysteresis, and non-linear with hysteresis. The statistical comparison between models demonstrates the higher accuracy of the kinetic approach to correctly represent the partial enthalpy distribution of latent heat storage materials during alternative phase change rates, obtaining a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.80. On the other hand, the accuracy of kinetic-independent models is limited to the range from 0.40 to 0.61. The results highlight the high discrepancies of conventional models compared to the kinetic approach and provide criteria and guidelines for efficient kinetic modelling of phase change in heat transfer evaluations.
Abstract
Ministry of Science and Innovation (FJC2019-039480-I)
Abstract
(MINECO-FEDER CTQ2017-83602-C2-1-R
Abstract
INTRAMURAL-CSIC 201960E092
Abstract
European Union's Horizon 2020 101023241
Abstract
Junta de Andalucía and FEDER P18-FR-1087 and US1262507
Additional details
- URL
- https://idus.us.es/handle//11441/134925
- URN
- urn:oai:idus.us.es:11441/134925
- Origin repository
- USE