Published August 21, 2017
| Version v1
Journal article
Ecological effects of full and partial protection in the crowded Mediterranean Sea: a regional meta-analysis
Contributors
Others:
- Ecosystèmes Côtiers Marins et Réponses aux Stress (ECOMERS) ; Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Côte d'Azur (UniCA)
- The University of Queensland (UQ [All campuses : Brisbane, Dutton Park Gatton, Herston, St Lucia and other locations])
- DTU Centre for Ocean Life ; Danmarks Tekniske Universitet = Technical University of Denmark (DTU)
- Hopkins Marine Station [Stanford] ; Stanford University
- Oregon State University (OSU)
- Biologie des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques (BOREA) ; Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN) ; Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université des Antilles (UA)
- Service du Patrimoine Naturel (SPN) ; Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Ministère de l'Environnement et du Cadre de vie
- Centre de recherches insulaires et observatoire de l'environnement (CRIOBE) ; Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE) ; Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL (LabEX CORAIL) ; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université des Antilles et de la Guyane (UAG)-École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE) ; Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de La Réunion (UR)-Université de la Polynésie Française (UPF)-Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (UNC)-Institut d'écologie et environnement-Université des Antilles (UA)
- World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)
- Bren School of Environmental Science & Management ; University of California [Santa Barbara] (UC Santa Barbara) ; University of California (UC)-University of California (UC)
- Universidad de Murcia
- Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare [Rome, Italie] (CoNISma)
- ANR-10-LABX-0008,CORAIL,Coral reefs facing global change(2010)
- ANR-16-ACHN-0016,PAVIS,Évaluation des relations entre les aires marines protégées et les espèces invasives(2016)
Description
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a cornerstone of marine conservation. Globally, the number and coverage of MPAs are increasing, but MPA implementation lags in many human-dominated regions. In areas with intense competition for space and resources, evaluation of the effects of MPAs is crucial to inform decisions. In the human-dominated Mediterranean Sea, fully protected areas occupy only 0.04% of its surface. We evaluated the impacts of full and partial protection on biomass and density of fish assemblages, some commercially important fishes, and sea urchins in 24 Mediterranean MPAs. We explored the relationships between the level of protection and MPA size, age, and enforcement. Results revealed significant positive effects of protection for fisheries target species and negative effects for urchins as their predators benefited from protection. Full protection provided stronger effects than partial protection. Benefits of full protection for fish biomass were only correlated with the level of MPA enforcement; fish density was higher in older, better enforced, and-interestingly-smaller MPAs. Our finding that even small, well-enforced, fully protected areas can have significant ecological effects is encouraging for "crowded" marine environments. However, more data are needed to evaluate sufficient MPA sizes for protecting populations of species with varying mobility levels. Marine protected areas (MPAs) have emerged as a prominent management tool for the conservation and recovery of marine ecosystems and their ecosystem services 1. As of 2015, announced and implemented MPAs around the world covered 3.6% of the ocean 2 , whereas actively managed MPAs covered only 2.1% 3. The level of protection in MPAs varies from fully protected, where all extractive activities are prohibited, to partially protected, where some extractive activities are allowed but with varying restrictions 2, 4. Over the past decade, many countries
Abstract
International audienceAdditional details
Identifiers
- URL
- https://mnhn.hal.science/mnhn-04285162
- URN
- urn:oai:HAL:mnhn-04285162v1
Origin repository
- Origin repository
- UNICA