Added value of [(18)F]FDOPA PET to the management of high-grade glioma patients after their initial treatment: a prospective multicentre study
- Others:
- Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Antoine Lacassagne [Nice] (UNICANCER/CAL) ; UNICANCER-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)
- UMR E4320 (TIRO-MATOs) ; Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS) ; COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN) ; Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image (LTSI) ; Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
- CRLCC Eugène Marquis (CRLCC)
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB) ; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy (CHU Nancy)
- The study was funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Health"Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique" (PHRC 2014 – 14.061).
Description
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic value of 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F]fluoro-L-phenylalanine ([(18)F]FDOPA) PET in patients with suspected recurrent gliomas is recognised. We conducted a multicentre prospective study to assess its added value in the practical management of patients suspected of recurrence of high grade gliomas (HGG). METHODS: Patients with a proven HGG (WHO grade III and IV) were referred to the multidisciplinary neuro-oncology board (MNOB) during their follow-up after initial standard of care treatment and when MRI findings were not fully conclusive. Each case was discussed in 2 steps. For step 1, a diagnosis and a management proposal were made only based on the clinical and the MRI data. For step 2, the same process was repeated taking the [(18)F]FDOPA PET results into consideration. A level of confidence for the decisions was assigned to each step. Changes in diagnosis and management induced by [(18)F]FDOPA PET information were measured. When unchanged, the difference in the confidence of the decisions were assessed. The diagnostic performances of each step were measured. RESULTS: 107 patients underwent a total of 138 MNOB assessments. The proposed diagnosis changed between step 1 and step 2 in 37 cases (26.8%) and the proposed management changed in 31 cases (22.5%). When the management did not change, the confidence in the MNOB final decision was increased in 87 cases (81.3%). Step 1 had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 83%, 58% and 66% and step 2, 86%, 64% and 71% respectively. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]FDOPA PET adds significant information for the follow-up of HGG patients in clinical practice. When MRI findings are not straightforward, it can change the management for more than 20% of the patients and increases the confidence level of the multidisciplinary board decisions.
Abstract
International audience
Additional details
- URL
- https://hal.science/hal-04088513
- URN
- urn:oai:HAL:hal-04088513v1
- Origin repository
- UNICA