Results in the elderly with locally advanced rectal cancer from the ACCOR12/PRODIGE 2 phase III trial: Tolerance and efficacy
- Others:
- Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Antoine Lacassagne [Nice] (UNICANCER/CAL) ; UNICANCER-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)
- CRLCC Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque
- Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon]
- Service de cancérologie et radiothérapie [Saint-Louis] ; Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Groupe Hospitalier Saint Louis - Lariboisière - Fernand Widal [Paris] ; Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)
- Clinique Armoricaine de Radiologie [St. Brieuc]
- Hôpital Saint-André
- Service d'oncologie digestive et hépato-gastro-entérologie [Hôpital de la Timone - APHM] ; Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM)- Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] (TIMONE)
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin [Nancy] (UNICANCER/ICL) ; UNICANCER
- Maladies chroniques, santé perçue, et processus d'adaptation (APEMAC) ; Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Université de Lorraine (UL)
- UNICANCER
Description
BACKGROUND:Rectal cancer predominantly affects the elderly. Unfortunately, this age category is under-represented in clinical trials because clinicians are loath to include patients with a high risk of comorbidity.PATIENTS AND METHODS:An exploratory analysis of the ACCORD12/PRODIGE 2 phase III trial was carried out to retrospectively compare the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy between the elderly (≥70 years; n=142) and younger patients (<70 years; n=442), this analysis was not preplanned in the study protocol. Patients with histologically confirmed resectable stage T3 or T4 rectal adenocarcinoma were eligible with an age limit of 80 years.RESULTS:Overall, the two age categories did not statistically differ in terms of patient's clinical and tumor baseline characteristics. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy leads to more severe grade 3/4 toxicities (25.6% vs. 15.8%, p=0.01) and more permanent stomas (33.3% vs. 22.8%, p=0.014) in elderly patients who were less often operated on than younger patients (95.8% vs. 99.0%, p=0.008). The relative number of interventions per surgery type (p=0.18), treatment efficacy in terms of R0 resection rate (88.6% vs. 90.6%; p=0.54) and complete pathological response (14.7% vs. 16.9%; p=0.55) were nearly identical between the two categories.CONCLUSION:Altogether these results warrant the development of specific optimal therapeutic strategies for the elderly.
Abstract
International audience
Additional details
- URL
- https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01808814
- URN
- urn:oai:HAL:hal-01808814v1
- Origin repository
- UNICA