High contrast at small separation - III. Impact on the dark hole of MEMS deformable mirror control electronics
- Others:
- Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur (OCA) ; Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Joseph Louis LAGRANGE (LAGRANGE) ; Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur ; Université Côte d'Azur (UniCA)-Université Côte d'Azur (UniCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Laboratoire d'études spatiales et d'instrumentation en astrophysique = Laboratory of Space Studies and Instrumentation in Astrophysics (LESIA) ; Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris ; Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)
Description
The creation of a dark hole (DH) region in the science image for exoplanet direct detection depends on deformable mirrors (DMs), where the imperfect control of DM limits the achievable contrast. The mirror surface height resolution is set by the DM drive electronics, and the quantization errors in DM impact the contrast in the DH. Consequently, determining the optimal voltage value for the flattening map of DM is essential, as it involves balancing dynamic and accuracy considerations. We conduct a numerical study to examine the impact of these parameters on microelectromechanical DM within the high-contrast field of view of several DHs with various characteristics and optical configurations. Our analysis includes an exploration of their influence on both small and moderate angular separations. We compare our numerical results with a formula available in the literature that aims to capture the dependence of contrast on DM quantization errors. We show that the formula accuracy to predict the contrast limit when the DM deflection curves follow the as-manufactured quadratic power law is dependent on the DM flattening map voltage domain, regardless of DH size and angular separations. Further these results appear to be insensitive to factors such as actuator number, coronagraph type, set-up architecture, and science objective (small or moderate angular separations). We provide guidelines for determining the optimal voltage for the DM flattening map, discuss the domain validity of the formula used to predict DM quantization errors on the contrast, and provide insights into balancing DM actuator density and mirror surface height resolution.
Abstract
International audience
Additional details
- URL
- https://insu.hal.science/insu-04853423
- URN
- urn:oai:HAL:insu-04853423v1
- Origin repository
- UNICA