Published 2021
| Version v1
Publication
Utility of 1,3 β-d-Glucan Assay for Guidance in Antifungal Stewardship Programs for Oncologic Patients and Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Creators
- Machado, Marina
- Chamorro de Vega, Esther
- Martínez-Jiménez, María Del Carmen
- Rodríguez-González, Carmen Guadalupe
- Vena, Antonio
- Navarro, Raquel
- Zamora-Cintas, María Isabel
- Agnelli, Caroline
- Olmedo, María
- Galar, Alicia
- Guinea, Jesús
- Fernández-Cruz, Ana
- Alonso, Roberto
- Bouza, Emilio
- Muñoz, Patricia
- Valerio, Maricela
Contributors
Others:
- Machado, Marina
- Chamorro de Vega, Esther
- Martínez-Jiménez, María Del Carmen
- Rodríguez-González, Carmen Guadalupe
- Vena, Antonio
- Navarro, Raquel
- Zamora-Cintas, María Isabel
- Agnelli, Caroline
- Olmedo, María
- Galar, Alicia
- Guinea, Jesú
- Fernández-Cruz, Ana
- Alonso, Roberto
- Bouza, Emilio
- Muñoz, Patricia
- Valerio, Maricela
Description
The implementation of 1,3 beta-d-glucan (BDG) has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in antifungal stewardship programs (ASPs). We aimed to analyze the influence of serum BDG in an ASP for oncologic patients and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We conducted a pre-post study. In the initial period (PRE), the ASP was based on bedside advice, and this was complemented with BDG in the post-period (POST). Performance parameters of the BDG assay were determined. Antifungal (AF) use adequacy was evaluated using a point score. Clinical outcomes and AF costs were also compared before and after the intervention. Overall, 85 patients were included in the PRE-period and 112 in the POST-period. Probable or proven fungal infections were similar in both groups (54.1% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.67). The determination of BDG contributed to improved management in 75 of 112 patients (66.9%). The AF adequacy score improved in the POST-period (mean 7.75 vs. 9.29; p < 0.001). Median days of empiric AF treatment was reduced in the POST-period (9 vs. 5 days, p = 0.04). All-cause mortality (44.7% vs. 34.8%; p = 0.16) was similar in both periods. The cost of AF treatments was reduced in the POST-period with a difference of 779.6 euro/patient. Our data suggest that the use of BDG was a cost-effective strategy that contributed to safely improving the results of an ASP for SOT and oncologic patients.
Additional details
Identifiers
- URL
- http://hdl.handle.net/11567/1095297
- URN
- urn:oai:iris.unige.it:11567/1095297
Origin repository
- Origin repository
- UNIGE